Should businessmen who commit fraud go to prison? This question has been asked repeatedly since 2008. It was also raised in nineteenth-century Britain when the spread of corporate capitalism created enormous new opportunities for dishonesty. Historians have presented Victorian Britain as a haven for white-collar criminals, beneficiaries of a prejudiced criminal justice system which only dealt harshly with offences by the poor. Boardroom Scandal challenges
these beliefs. Based on an unparalleled sample of legal cases - many examined here for the first time - James Taylor presents a radical new interpretation of the relationship between
capitalism and the law. Initially, there were no criminal sanctions against publishing false prospectuses, concealing losses in balance sheets, and even misappropriating company money. But parliament became convinced of the need to criminalize these practices to protect the culture of stock market investment on which mid-Victorian prosperity increasingly rested. Persuading judges to play along was harder, with many invoking the principle of caveat emptor to exonerate defendants. But by the end
of the century, successful prosecutions of company executives were commonplace. These trials performed multiple functions: they stabilized confidence in times of crisis; they dramatized the class
blindness of the law; and they were increasingly seen as essential as faith in a self-regulating economy ebbed. The criminalization of fraud, therefore, has far-reaching implications for our understanding of nineteenth-century Britain. It also has relevance today in light of the on-going economic crisis and the issues it raises regarding business ethics and the role of the state.
Should businessmen who commit fraud go to prison? This question has been asked repeatedly since 2008. It was also raised in nineteenth-century Britain when the spread of corporate capitalism created enormous new opportunities for dishonesty. Historians have presented Victorian Britain as a haven for white-collar criminals, beneficiaries of a prejudiced criminal justice system which only dealt harshly with offences by the poor. Boardroom Scandal challenges
these beliefs. Based on an unparalleled sample of legal cases - many examined here for the first time - James Taylor presents a radical new interpretation of the relationship between
capitalism and the law. Initially, there were no criminal sanctions against publishing false prospectuses, concealing losses in balance sheets, and even misappropriating company money. But parliament became convinced of the need to criminalize these practices to protect the culture of stock market investment on which mid-Victorian prosperity increasingly rested. Persuading judges to play along was harder, with many invoking the principle of caveat emptor to exonerate defendants. But by the end
of the century, successful prosecutions of company executives were commonplace. These trials performed multiple functions: they stabilized confidence in times of crisis; they dramatized the class
blindness of the law; and they were increasingly seen as essential as faith in a self-regulating economy ebbed. The criminalization of fraud, therefore, has far-reaching implications for our understanding of nineteenth-century Britain. It also has relevance today in light of the on-going economic crisis and the issues it raises regarding business ethics and the role of the state.
1: Introduction: Company Fraud in Historical Perspective
PART I: TOLERATION
2: The Morals of Mania: The 1820s
3: Mismanagement or Fraud? The 1830s
PART TWO: CRIMINALIZATION
4: Baffling Fraud: The 1840s
5: Criminalizing Fraud: The 1850s
6: One Law for the Rich? The 1860s
PART THREE: ENFORCEMENT
7: Offences Against the State: The 1870s
8: A Mixed Economy of Prosecutions: The 1880s
9: Regulating the City: The 1890s
10: Epilogue: Following the Victorian Path
James Taylor is a senior lecturer in the Department of History at Lancaster University. He is the author of Creating Capitalism and co-author of Shareholder Democracies.
James Taylor has established himself as one of the leading
historians of corporate capitalism in nineteenth-century Britain,
and his new monograph further augments his reputation. As with
Taylor's previous work, this book is very readable because the
author uses engaging and sometimes humorous vignettes to trace the
evolution of the criminalization of company fraud.
*John D. Turner, Economic History Review*
Boardroom Scandal is both a thought-provoking and engaging book, a
substantial work of historical recovery which will push future
studies of both the nineteenth-century economy and criminal justice
history in new directions.
*Rosalind Crone, History*
This book by James Taylor is an excellent example of an emerging
approach to the study of the past that could be called forensic
history.
*Ranald Michie, English Historical Review*
Taylor sets corporate fraud in a broader perspective, which
encompasses the evolution of the law, political economy, and
contemporary perceptions of who was right and who was wrong. He
deserves to be congratulated for this excellent piece of
scholarship.
*David Higgins, Enterprise & Society*
|
Ask a Question About this Product More... |
|
